G'day all.
I put in evacuated tube systems at my place & mum's place about 15 months ago. They're 30tube/315 stainless electric boosted aae systems. There's little difference between aae & apricus or hills systems, other than possibly the type of controller used on individual instals, so brand is fairly irrelevent in my view. Mine is close to optimum position N & angle (35), mum's WNW orientation & angled at 40deg, (her roof pitch).
Overwhelmingly happy with both. Both operate with boost switched off for all but the most extended periods of overcast & rain, as we had in mid winter. Today, as the sun goes down, my tank is at 78deg top, 70 deg bottom, & that's with long showering son coming off shift in the middle of the day & doing his best to run it down. Mum tells me hers is currently 76/59. It has been a hell of a good solar day as indicated by my PV system (2.4kW) which has produced a tad over 16kWhrs today too.
I've been over my bills for the last 2 years to compared the power used by my previous 400ltr offpeak Rheem system & this system. With a house of 5 adults until recently, the old 400ltr Rheem used 4,138kWhr on off-peak the previous year. This full year of the ET SHW system has used a total of only 292kWhrs. I think it safe to presume even with the standing controller & circulation pump, our HW power demands have been cut by approximately 90%pa. Mum's is a 2 person household & her boost requirements of both OPSHW & ET systems were approximately half my figures.
When I bought the system & decided on the ET design, it was with the deliberate intent to eliminate electrical current from the system to the maximum extent. As an old engineer, I'm only too well aware that the biggest enemy of metallic systems is electricity & dissimilar metals; stainless, copper, brass, steel, aluminium. If one can largely eliminate electric currents from the system, system life, especially that of the tank ought to be significantly improved. I also think power & gas companies will continue to push up prices & move to parity pricing per energy unit. If you reckon my motives look more to do with the hip pocket than 'green' considerations, you'd not be wrong.
Very pleased to reduce pollution, but also very pleased to reduce the pull on the wallet & so far very satisfied with these solar systems.
Posted Friday 12 Nov 2010 @ 7:49:36 am from IP
#